The participants of our Olympiad tackled real-life scientific problems, from genetic calculations to cutting-edge genome assembly.
Today, we ran the OIBO theoretical round, featuring 60 tasks. The participants had four hours to handle multiple‑choice tests, matching exercises, and complex calculations. According to our academic council, the difficulty level increased considerably compared to the previous year.
The exam structure remained the same. First 40 multiple choice questions with one correct option out of five were followed by 10 matching tasks, and, finally, 10 calculation problems. The maximum score was 300. However, this year there were fewer easy test questions, while more challenging calculation tasks came on stage. The topics covered the entire spectrum of modern biology — from molecular biology, biochemistry, and cell biology to plant and animal biology, physiology, and genetics.
Beyond factual knowledge, the Olympiad tested such hands-on skills essential for a practicing biologist as analyzing information and finding interdisciplinary connections, especially those between biology and physics, or biology and chemistry. Yet the toughest opponent for every participant was the time. The fact that the time is limited is exactly what turns an olympiad into a competitive sport.